<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highly Directional USB Wifi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.Addictronics.com/projects/highly-directional-usb-wifi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.Addictronics.com/projects/highly-directional-usb-wifi</link>
	<description>An Online Portfolio For My Electronic Projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 02:15:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.Addictronics.com/projects/highly-directional-usb-wifi/comment-page-1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addictronics.com/projects/highly-directional-usb-wifi#comment-218</guid>
		<description>@Catonic, You are absolutely correct. This project was done back in my early years of electronics before I really understood gain/db even ohm&#039;s law. Thank you for keeping me straight! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Catonic, You are absolutely correct. This project was done back in my early years of electronics before I really understood gain/db even ohm&#8217;s law. Thank you for keeping me straight! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catonic</title>
		<link>http://www.Addictronics.com/projects/highly-directional-usb-wifi/comment-page-1#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Catonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addictronics.com/projects/highly-directional-usb-wifi#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Math fail on the calculation of gain. The antenna is highly directional, but there&#039;s no physical way to get 46dB of gain at 2.4 GHz using such a small reflector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Math fail on the calculation of gain. The antenna is highly directional, but there&#8217;s no physical way to get 46dB of gain at 2.4 GHz using such a small reflector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
